Author Archives: kentech
Not that I will probably race it for some time, but I will run the car soon.
With the equipment seen, being:
- Muchmore LCG Max-Punch FD2 6000mAh/120C
- Muchmore Fleta ZX V2 with alu screws
- Muchmore Fleta Pro V2
- Futaba BLS571SV
- MRT mPTX Pro transponder
And on Volante indoor pre-glued tyres with a Protoform Mazdaspeed 6 LW body, the car with the included ballast weights (45+10+10g) is 1340g. Please note that I use quite a few alu screws on the car.
If you read my blog, and use Facebook, please like/follow the page for notifications of new posts and extra material in the future. Thank you! 🙂
For the TRF419XR, Tamiya has at least for now decided on the rather strange strategy of selling it as a full chassis kit only on the domestic Japan market, while export markets gets the TRF419XR Conversion Set.
Therefore, we take a look at the 42317 TRF419XR Conversion Set in this build. Luckily, I have a lightly used TRF419X in good condition, so this car will be the basis for this build. Please note that the conversion set can only be used to upgrade the TRF419X and TRF419X WS versions. It is not intended for the older TRF419, which has many differences to the X versions.
This build will obviously also give a good picture of the 42316 TRF419XR Chassis Kit, as the finished car will be the same, with the only parts not included in the conversion but in the car kit being the optional taller damper towers for the older longer TRF dampers, and the heavy battery holders mainly intended for use with light Tamiya stick packs.
According to Tamiya, this latest evolution of the TRF419 focuses on cornering speed and steering response. Let’s see how they have strived to acheive that then!
The conversion set comes in this flat box in typical TRF styling. It is surprisingly light, so no big shipping fees on this product!
Next up you see a picture of the actual contents of the TRF419XR Conversion Set.
Obviously there is a new main chassis, a new upper deck, and new lower bulkheads. The left and right motor mounts are new, with a nice aluminium fan mount that attaches to the motor mount also included. The inner part of the servo mount is also new.
There is a new heavy 45g center ballast weight, as well as part for the new center pitch stiffener, with options of a carbon brace and a turnbuckle link all included. Finally there is the new 5mm center shaft with new 5x8mm flanged bearings, while finally in the picture you also see the 4x7mm bearings and rod stoppers for the now bearing supported roll-bars.
Missing from the picture but included in the set is various screws, shims and nuts, as well as ball cups for the pitch stiffener. There is an 8-page manual, with more setup tips than normal for Tamiya, and a new TRF419XR sticker set. These can be seen in the previous post here on Blog Kentech.
First, let’s take a look at the small differences between the original TRF419X lower deck and the new TRF419XR lower deck.
As you can see from the picture, they are fairly similar, but there are quite a few small changes.
The 419XR lower deck is 2.25mm thick, while the 419X is 2.15mm, so it is 0.1mm thicker. Both are the same width at 85mm. The outline of the chassis is very similar, but the new XR chassis is around 1mm wider per side, roughly between the front arm downstop screw extension and until it reaches it maximum width in front of the servo/battery mount.
As can be clearly seen, the cutouts under the diff/spool are much larger and now fully symmetrical. Apart from this, the changes are that there are extra holes for the new motor mount, servo mount, and center weight added, as well as some new holes on the centerline behind the motor mount. The cutouts for allowing access to the pinion gear from the underside has been deleted.
The XR chassis is 1g heavier at 70g.
The upper deck is again slightly revised. The front “V” cutout is slightly wider and longer by around 4mm. There are other very slight differences on the cutouts as well, but perhaps the most noticeable change is the larger cutout towards the rear to allow access to the pinion after the access holes to the lower deck were deleted.
Both the X and XR upper decks are 2.0mm thick and of a similar type of carbon fibre.
Below you see a comparison between the original 419X lower bulkheads, and the new 419XR bulkheads. The only real change is the addition of the bearing holders for the new bearing supported roll-bars. I left the old roll-bar holders to the old bulkheads for reference. Weight is basically exactly the same.
As you can see, the three screw holes for fastening the bulkheads to the chassis has been retained, with corresponding holes also on the XR lower deck. This gives you the option of 2 screws in different locations, or 3 screws, all to give more flex adjustability.
Bulkheads mounted to the chassis.
Again, a side by side view of the 419X and 419XR left and right motor mounts. The big difference is that the XR mount has three more holes further back on the center line mounting, giving you even more flex tuning options.
The shape of the motor mount is also slightly changed at the front, as well as at the rear with the a hole for the included motor fan mount added. The right side mount has been redesigned to have the same cutouts, while both have also been modified to accept the new larger M3 center shaft screws.
The initial setup uses screws in the same location as on the 419X, with optional holes further towards the rear.
Probably my favourite picture of this build so far! 🙂
Another side by side with the new and old inner servo mount, the only difference being the extension rearwards, with this hole also used for the new center pitch stiffener.
Different options for the center pitch stiffener are included.
This is the default setup, with the 2.5mm thick carbon fibre stiffener used with the “semi” countersunk holes and countersunk screws. Steel screws are included, I used Tamiya alu screws.
You can also turn the carbon stiffener over and use normal round-head screws, for slightly less stiffness.
A further option described in the manual, with parts included in the kit, is the following setup.
This option uses 3x20mm screws that go through the chassis, servo and motor mounts as well as the stiffener posts and the carbon stiffener. Then 0.7mm spacers are added on top while everything is secured by M3 nuts.
The final option incuded is this turnbuckle and ball connector setup, being the most flexible option of center stiffeners.
The old 30g center ballast weight from the X, is replaced with this 45g piece on the XR. Again, more options have been added when it comes to mounting it to the chassis, even further increasing setup possibilities.
Here mounted to the chassis, with the cutout for the belt visible.
Together with the center pitch stiffener, the setup looks like this.
That Tamiya includes these parts with the kit, and not only as option parts, has to be seen as a big positive.
The multiple holes on the chassis center line that can be used for flex adjustmens with the motor mount, center ballast weight, and center stiffener.
The new center shaft is 5mm thick instead of the previous 4mm, and uses flanged 5x8mm bearings inside the 20T pulleys, in place of the previous 4x8mm flanged bearings. This change also allows M3 screws to be used instead of the fragile M2.6 screws used previously.
Next I will continue assembling the whole car, but I chose to present the new parts in this way first, as this is a conversion kit and not a whole car kit.
I will go over the rest of the car quite quickly with just a few pictures, as most of it is basically about adding the parts from the TRF419X, which I built already in May 2016. I will focus mostly on the rest of the new 419XR parts in the remaining pictures.
As you can see I assembled the car with a diff using the 42310 37T Aluminum Differential Pulley, as I have had one lying around but never tested.
Both the rear diff and front spool are mounted in the low position in the 419XR manual, as opposed to the 419X where the initial position was high.
The new bearing supported roll-bar system works well, being easy to work on and setup as well as solid and precise.
As only the inner alu mount is new on the servo mounting, the old parts are attached to the inner part, here with the servo already installed.
I have already shown you the updated upper deck previously in this post, but this is what it looks like in the car.
The fitment is fairly tight around the pulleys, just like on the 419X, so be careful that they spin freely without touching the upper deck.
Also check that the ends of the upper deck are not too tight against the upper bulkheads. There should be a bit of distance between these to avoid tweak issues, so shave the upper deck if needed.
As I mentioned earlier, the V opening at the front of the upper deck is slightly larger on the XR.
The same 10g weights from the X fit the XR chassis as well, so in total you now have one 45g center weight, and two 10g weights.
Overview of the almost finished TRF419XR chassis.
With the 0.1mm thicker lower deck and new center stiffener (in its stiffest setting per manual), the 419XR feels fairly stiff.
Finally a look at the new cooling fan post included with the TRF419XR conversion set. An elegant and lightweight design with mounting holes for both 30mm and 40mm fans. The post itself fits into a hole at the base of the motor mount, and is secured with a small grub screw from below (through an access hole in the carbon fibre lower deck).
That’s it for the TRF419XR conversion then. Thanks for reading!
Overall I feel this is a good refresh of the TRF419X, which in itself has been of the best TRF cars ever in my opinion. Hopefully the XR will take the platform even further. With a track available to test at, I look forward to properly testing it on track soon.
I will leave you with a couple of pictures of the completed TRF419XR chassis on wheels, spoked wheels of course! 🙂
Just a small note that I added a few options to the MTC1 last week.
Apart from a few more rollbar options, the new parts for me were these.:
– The 20g center weight in place of the standard alu stiffener. Makes life easier with the car now being significantly underweight.
– The aluminium M4 turnbuckles for the front upper arms. Considering their location in the car, I figured this would be a good place to save weight. Detail in the second photo.
Certainly my favourite in looks of the current competitive TC bodies is the Bittydesign M410, launched earlier this year. And that’s from someone who never liked BMW’s 😉
I have no previous personal experience of Bittydesign bodies, and with the new Ultra Lite Weight version now available, I wanted to take a look as well as test the body on track as it has become quite popular.
Looks quite good, eh? Just a Tamiya spray can paintjob 🙂
Painting a body like this with cans always adds quite a few grams. But even with this spray can paint, a heavy wing, and all stickered up, the M410 ULT weighs only 75g.
Finally time to upgrade my older Muchmore motor to a V2.
Also a nice way to save a bit of weight high up, especially with the newly released FLETA ZX V2 Case & Timing cap Aluminum Screws. Available in Gun Metal, Red, and Orange. Blue would be nice too 🙂
The screws save about 3.5g, while they have some other benefits as well. The rest of the difference in weight comes from the V1 to V2 difference. Gun Metal screws on the motor in the picture.
After many years of stalemate, the last couple of years has finally seen some development on the ISTC bodies scene. To answer the much tougher competition, long-time market leader Protoform has recently launched the new Type-S body, available in lightweight and pro-lite versions.
The Type-S is certainly a very aggressive and fairly extreme interpretation of the ISTC GBS body rules. Perhaps the most extreme released so far, from any manufacturer. It’s really refreshing to finally see new ideas and development on the bodies we run. But with this the apparent direction of development from other manufacturer’s as well, is it perhaps time to take a look at the ISTC body rules again, as the bodies are now really starting to remind us of the extreme bodies which finally led to the GBS rules being introduced many years ago?
Taste is personal, but to my eyes the Type-S and many recently released bodies from all manufacturers are certainly no beauties. In reality, ISTC bodies have not been good looking for the last 15 years already, but perhaps most people don’t care? Would it be a good idea to restrict more, or perhaps the opposite and let the body manufacturers go even further on aero development with less restrictions? I have no answers, but personally I world prefer much more realistic bodies, but then that is no surprise to regular readers! 🙂
Anyway, the details of the Protoform Type-S should be fairly visible in these photos.
Yes, it is true, I finally made a Facebook page for the blog!
Don’t worry though, the blog ain’t going nowhere, all content will be on here as it has been since 2005. Based on inspiration and time, activity is more or less, just like it has been since the start. Did you know this has been around for 12 years already?
Anyway, please follow the page if you want to, if you are on Facebook.